The Relevance of EOQ(Economic Ordering Quantity) model in India

The Relevance of EOQ(Economic Ordering Quantity) model in India

Pacl Vs Sebi(Pearl Agro Vs Securities and exchange board of India)

Pacl Vs Sebi(Pearl Agro Vs Securities and exchange board of India)

Monetary And Fiscal Policies India

Monetary And Fiscal Policies

Review Tanu Weds Manu Returns

I am going to keep it simple, watch it and have your own experience, only point of this review is to strictly mention, watching Tanu weds manu returns is worth your time and money.

Many blogs mentions names of director , actors, and other crew, to point out their credentials, but that will lengthen the post.

It is romantic comedy and evens conveys message about Haryana's gender discrimination successfully.

Short details without spoiling it for you , great use of prosthetics and makeup, hard use of accent , costume designer Reza Shariffi 

Not a single actor is out of place, sometimes it may feel little onscreen time for some characters but whatever time they get it is worthwhile , everybody acts , maybe indian movies are changing.
It would increase your experience if you watch part 1

Haryanvi Kusum even have a brother who is love married ,intercaste , well I just can't believe , but they say even Arvind Kejriwal is from Haryana. The dress which looks like Short Kurta is exactly what the women of the region wears.

Madhavan is a gem, India needs many Madhavans . 

Music is good, Banno tera swagger means attitude referring to the accent of  actress.

Enough of the review , I am not fully able to justify it , just watch it, it is 100% not a waste of time or I didn't get it type movie. I have kept it short intentionally.

HOW TO FIND THE TRUTH, METHODS FOR A REGULAR PERSON

THESE ARTICLES WOULD TRY TO PROVIDE A METHOD TO FIND TRUTH IN EASY AND PRACTICAL STEPS, POSSIBLE FOR EVERYONE FOR ONCE TO TRY AND 

MAKE TIME TO TRY IT , OVERCOME EXCUSES, DISEASE,LACK OF RESOURCES OR STRENGTH TO OVERCOME SITUATIONS

SO THAT THE EXCUSE OR GUILT, I DIDN'T KNOW HOW COMES IN MIND

"and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free."

Bible says it, Many other religious books, great personalities have said it, even CIA original headquarter says it in latin Veritas vos liberabit, many universities have this latin wordings as their motto, so if you are reading it , that means me as writer and you as reader are asking us the very same question What is truth , and pretty much that sets the question of this article?

What is truth, how to find it or know it , is it one point instance like Gautam Buddha's life or is it a journey.

If you are getting the same curiosity aroused by this question, go on reading it for others, truth will make you free or liberated as they say, so you just need to find the method or technique to find and explore the truth,

After getting it,nobody can give it you because he is already liberated , but sure can tell you the elusive method, so lets try to make it easy to understand.

Some people talk English, some other language, some are able to understand why there are missions to outer world or quantum mechanics, some like my country are illiterate to read anything, some are slow learners, specially abled, some are nice people who cry at movies, some people are trying to create fear through terrorism, so basically there is wide variety of people.

So, as many persons are there , it just adds to all the confusion on the mindset of everyone, and also external factor like race, culture, religion, country or gender only provides as with our own view of the truth, so what to believe and what not, well these all are just they superficial layers or say sunglasses of different shades, 

when you teach or preach someone you would have to be teaching on persons own level , persons can be convict facing capital punishment or just a young student trying to choose between various courses after high school. So these things are just a persons tiny obstacles to one's method to find the truth.

Religion,spiritualism, physical and mental exercises are all just the method to survive they can aide you on the journey but can't take you there. 

Having eyes and ears can only provide you to reasons and science behind external events, but the things most of us are looking for an answers are very personal in nature, like money, food, families, love meaning of life.

I myself have tried and understood many things but not fully, why not because of mundane tasks, we all have to do, eating, sleeping, making money, fulfilling social obligations and list goes on, but if I would have got it,

the wording says the truth will set you free , well I am not free till I living in this world basic tasks of breathing provide comfort and food to this body will go on.

I am going to give you tools which were helpful in my journey 

Cognitive distortions

Some psychologist gave list of common cognitive distortions 

What’s a cognitive distortion and why do so many people have them? Cognitive distortions are simply ways that our mind convinces us of something that isn’t really true. These inaccurate thoughts are usually used to reinforce negative thinking or emotions — telling ourselves things that sound rational and accurate, but really only serve to keep us feeling bad about ourselves.

For instance, a person might tell themselves, “I always fail when I try to do something new; I therefore fail at everything I try.” This is an example of “black or white” (or polarized) thinking. The person is only seeing things in absolutes — that if they fail at one thing, they must fail at all things. If they added, “I must be a complete loser and failure” to their thinking, that would also be an example of overgeneralization — taking a failure at one specific task and generalizing it their very self and identity.

Cognitive distortions are at the core of what many cognitive-behavioral and other kinds of therapists try and help a person learn to change in psychotherapy. By learning to correctly identify this kind of “stinkin’ thinkin’,” a person can then answer the negative thinking back, and refute it. By refuting the negative thinking over and over again, it will slowly diminish overtime and be automatically replaced by more rational, balanced thinking.

Cognitive Distortions

Aaron Beck first proposed the theory behind cognitive distortions and David Burns was responsible for popularizing it with common names and examples for the distortions.

1. Filtering.

We take the negative details and magnify them while filtering out all positive aspects of a situation. For instance, a person may pick out a single, unpleasant detail and dwell on it exclusively so that their vision of reality becomes darkened or distorted.

2. Polarized Thinking (or “Black and White” Thinking).

In polarized thinking, things are either “black-or-white.” We have to be perfect or we’re a failure — there is no middle ground. You place people or situations in “either/or” categories, with no shades of gray or allowing for the complexity of most people and situations. If your performance falls short of perfect, you see yourself as a total failure.

3. Overgeneralization.

In this cognitive distortion, we come to a general conclusion based on a single incident or a single piece of evidence. If something bad happens only once, we expect it to happen over and over again. A person may see a single, unpleasant event as part of a never-ending pattern of defeat.

4. Jumping to Conclusions.

Without individuals saying so, we know what they are feeling and why they act the way they do. In particular, we are able to determine how people are feeling toward us.

For example, a person may conclude that someone is reacting negatively toward them but doesn’t actually bother to find out if they are correct. Another example is a person may anticipate that things will turn out badly, and will feel convinced that their prediction is already an established fact.

5. Catastrophizing.

We expect disaster to strike, no matter what. This is also referred to as “magnifying or minimizing.” We hear about a problem and use what if questions (e.g., “What if tragedy strikes?” “What if it happens to me?”).

For example, a person might exaggerate the importance of insignificant events (such as their mistake, or someone else’s achievement). Or they may inappropriately shrink the magnitude of significant events until they appear tiny (for example, a person’s own desirable qualities or someone else’s imperfections).

With practice, you can learn to answer each of these cognitive distortions.
6. Personalization.

Personalization is a distortion where a person believes that everything others do or say is some kind of direct, personal reaction to the person. We also compare ourselves to others trying to determine who is smarter, better looking, etc.

A person engaging in personalization may also see themselves as the cause of some unhealthy external event that they were not responsible for. For example, “We were late to the dinner party and caused the hostess to overcook the meal. If I had only pushed my husband to leave on time, this wouldn’t have happened.”

7. Control Fallacies.

If we feel externally controlled, we see ourselves as helpless a victim of fate. For example, “I can’t help it if the quality of the work is poor, my boss demanded I work overtime on it.” The fallacy of internal control has us assuming responsibility for the pain and happiness of everyone around us. For example, “Why aren’t you happy? Is it because of something I did?”

8. Fallacy of Fairness.

We feel resentful because we think we know what is fair, but other people won’t agree with us. As our parents tell us when we’re growing up and something doesn’t go our way, “Life isn’t always fair.” People who go through life applying a measuring ruler against every situation judging its “fairness” will often feel badly and negative because of it. Because life isn’t “fair” — things will not always work out in your favor, even when you think they should.

9. Blaming.

We hold other people responsible for our pain, or take the other track and blame ourselves for every problem. For example, “Stop making me feel bad about myself!” Nobody can “make” us feel any particular way — only we have control over our own emotions and emotional reactions.

10. Shoulds.

We have a list of ironclad rules about how others and we should behave. People who break the rules make us angry, and we feel guilty when we violate these rules. A person may often believe they are trying to motivate themselves with shoulds and shouldn’ts, as if they have to be punished before they can do anything.

For example, “I really should exercise. I shouldn’t be so lazy.” Musts and oughts are also offenders. The emotional consequence is guilt. When a person directs should statements toward others, they often feel anger, frustration and resentment.

11. Emotional Reasoning.

We believe that what we feel must be true automatically. If we feel stupid and boring, then we must be stupid and boring. You assume that your unhealthy emotions reflect he way things really are — “I feel it, therefore it must be true.”

12. Fallacy of Change.

We expect that other people will change to suit us if we just pressure or cajole them enough. We need to change people because our hopes for happiness seem to depend entirely on them.

13. Global Labeling.

We generalize one or two qualities into a negative global judgment. These are extreme forms of generalizing, and are also referred to as “labeling” and “mislabeling.” Instead of describing an error in context of a specific situation, a person will attach an unhealthy label to themselves.

For example, they may say, “I’m a loser” in a situation where they failed at a specific task. When someone else’s behavior rubs a person the wrong way, they may attach an unhealthy label to him, such as “He’s a real jerk.” Mislabeling involves describing an event with language that is highly colored and emotionally loaded. For example, instead of saying someone drops her children off at daycare every day, a person who is mislabeling might say that “she abandons her children to strangers.”

14. Always Being Right.

We are continually on trial to prove that our opinions and actions are correct. Being wrong is unthinkable and we will go to any length to demonstrate our rightness. For example, “I don’t care how badly arguing with me makes you feel, I’m going to win this argument no matter what because I’m right.” Being right often is more important than the feelings of others around a person who engages in this cognitive distortion, even loved ones.

15. Heaven’s Reward Fallacy.

We expect our sacrifice and self-denial to pay off, as if someone is keeping score. We feel bitter when the reward doesn't come.

So after this long list I copied from psych central, this use of information is justified in larger public good, 

You have gone through this then well congrats that patience is what  needed for finding truth ,you will need to bookmark (CTRL + D ) this page to continue reading it because it is too much of information, and your mind which is habitual of easy things is trying to convince you otherwise,

 Grasp this more will be coming on what to do next 

comments and questions are very welcome 

Supremt court declares Section 66A of the Information Technology Act 2000 as amended in 2008 as invalid.

Problems with the recents events relating to Section 66A of IT Act
Section 66A was recently declared vague in its entirety and quashed down by Honorable Supreme court in WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.167 OF 2012 filed by Shreya Singhal a law student and other similar petitions. So lets ask what is Section 66A and why the Supreme court exercised its special powers to quash a section of an act of parliament.

Rise of over 350 % in crimes

The Information Technology Act 2000  is an Act of the Indian Parliament (No 21 of 2000) notified on October 17, 2000. this act was further amended in 2008. Section 66A was added in 2008. The basic act was to provide legal status to ever increasing use of information technology and issues arising because of it.
few of the issues it addressed were Legal recognition of electronic documents,Legal Recognition of digital signatures,Offenses and contraventions,Justice dispensation systems for cyber crimes.validation of e-contracts.

“66-A. Punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc.

—Any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device,—

(a) any information that is grossly

offensive or has menacing character; or

(b) any information which he knows to

be false, but for the purpose of causing

annoyance, inconvenience, danger,

obstruction, insult, injury, criminal

intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will,

persistently by making use of such

computer resource or a communication

device; or

(c) any electronic mail or electronic mail

message for the purpose of causing

annoyance or inconvenience or to

deceive or to mislead the addressee or

recipient about the origin of such

messages,

shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term

which may extend to three years and with fine.

Explanation.— For the purposes of this section, terms “electronic mail” and “electronic mail message” means a message or information created or transmitted or received on a computer, computer system, computer resource or communication device including attachments in text, image, audio, video and any other electronic record, which may be transmitted with the message.”

The Preamble of the Constitution of India inter alia speaks of liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. It also says that India is a sovereign democratic republic. It cannot be overemphasized that when it comes to democracy, liberty of thought and expression is a cardinal value that is of paramount significance under our constitutional scheme.

Now the question raised was vagueness in handling the complaints to police which were redressed by stating that a police officer of certain rank would only handle this cases. But the effect of many arrests of simple civil persons just criticizing certains events of politicians and high power people who won't take criticism in a right way.

So short the section is declared null, that means it doesn't have any legal standing right now.

But after studying the supreme court case order in detail, I think it will be a matter of time before our government is going to find out another method to exercise its power under article 19(2)
Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India states as follows:
“Article 19. Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.—(1) All
citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;”
 Article 19(2) states:
“Article 19. Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.—(2) Nothing in
sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State
from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right
conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of
the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to
contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.”

 The reason this verdict  is not going to withstand is that whole petition is based on arrest of a few people that was publicised because of overactive social media and some media houses. Some other arrests of religious fanatics and sexual offenders were also done through this section.The only thing which I believe other then the vagueness of "offensive" and its definition, the process of application of section was left in the hands of policemen , there lies the real problem, see that police is state body whose job is to maintain law and order , law and order as defined as the government in power at a particular time.

Two examples Arvind Kejriwal was beaten down by the same police before his party came into power, and other one Baba Ramdev was also beaten by the same police before change of government, so the right or wrong is decided by the the chosen government at the time and government is elected representatives and favours.

Above images from various media sources available from internet states the general public perception.

The media portrayed a particular image of Section 66A as instrument of censorship, and Honorable supreme court bought it.

It is welcome decision but it provides government to issue another amendment to exercise powers under Article 19(2)
Section 66A was not wrong but it use or say misuse was wrong , the handling of powers by police and administration needs to change with times , but that is going to be a slow process, so meanwhile Supreme court has given citizens a safety.




The problem lies in application of section 66A or any other similar section or acts, and that process improves itself through participation of general public at large and it's member who become part of government machinery. Lets see that the government tried to modify the process that complaint won't be registered before approval of officer of DCP rank in urban and rural areas and IG in metros. These methods are susceptible to fail.
If interested in the view of Supreme Court while giving its order Supreme court order
Lets hope government find a effective method to exercise its power without interfering with individual citizens right.
  

Effects of course of action Nirbhaya rape case delhi 2012 and Dimapur Nagaland Lynching 2015

Earlier I was trying to write a short story, it would have been the first one,anyways, while making tea yesterday , contemplating various actions to be taken in life, choosing between two variables may be this or that , to go with x or y, a or b, should I go with this option or that one ,or to not go at all, or as Shakespeare said "to be or not to be" to do or not do, these events caught my attention, with a time gap between them but mind is such a machine which can go and process multiple algorithm at the same time, any time. Now coming to, what is the topic, it is timing and events and course of action taken by my beloved country ,and of course it's people or as described in my other post, WE THE PEOPLE of INDIA, earlier events were related to rape of a girl of Delhi, otherwise known as #Nirbahya (fearless) case Delhi gang rape 16 dec 2012,Indian laws prohibit publishing name of victims and juveniles accused, not going into details here. and the other event which was 2015 #Dimapur mob #lynching, referring to the case of mob lynching that took place in Dimapur, Nagaland in India, on 5 March 2015 and BBC documentary #India's daughter on the Delhi rape case.

At the time of Delhi rape case I had just written my civil service main in october 2012 , and in december I was with my friend at Ajmer who was doing his MSC in medical microbiology from JLN medical college, me at that point was deeply interested in reading newspaper and magazine for my preparation and understanding the scenario and UPSC's emphasis on problem solving approach, after studying the constitution of India, had just completed PG diploma in criminology and forensic science, I thought it is going to be big event for India, and the event did multiple effects, some short term and some long term. Nirbhaya case waked a new power centre THE PEOPLE.

Effects of Nirbhaya Delhi Gang rape case 2012

And now talking about the other case, Nagaland Dimapur Lynching case of march 2015 , whole of the above chart process doesn't arise , but instead people took justice in their own hand, thinking in their own mind that they are right, this blogpost is not about what is right or wrong but more concerned with analysing, deducing  for pure personal standpoint, what can I do, what is my stand point of view.because after seeing people beating a nude man, bringing him out of central jail, many emotions evoke,most was of fear, sensing are we progressing or regressing. Many youngster may also have the same question for themselves, for them from my limited experience , asking and framing right question for oneself is most important, not following mob mentality simply.And remember 'no question is wrong answers can be'. In Nagaland case, people, as the news coming now, were politically motivated and  that to of sect based, killed a person who now seems to be innocent , coming from army family background and taking selfies with dead body, amazing that selfie may have been. A person sitting nude on rooftop considers himself special, in ignorance only, he senses people are liking him but alas they are shocked and amused by him, just like some politician making worthless, nonsensical comments and speeches.

People taking person out jail,Nagaland

If people of Delhi and other cities behaved in such manner in response to Delhi rape ,above chart outcomes would not have arisen. All the protestors were having the same anger frustration, shame, guilt but they choose to make amend of the system through democratic process.Killing a person is not the solution , we are the largest democracy, only 7 decades old, we have everything in right place, we will have to find solutions in the just manner , if history is taught to students , they should be asked difference between the two events, even USA the america had similar problems in the starting of their democracy, lynching was also the method used there, some 3 centuries back but they overcome each and every problem through democratic process.Today with a new government in power , the erstwhile party in power is now sidelined, this whole process, might seem chaos, but there is process, and as human beings we have the power to choose , the free will.What did the people of Dimapur Nagaland who take part in lynching got , well answers are clear but they themselves have to ponder over it.Statement of Dimapur SP was that mob wore dress of students, so they couldn't fire.Collective guilt is very strenuous thing, imagine plight of people of Afghanistan, Pakistan,North Korea,China and Russia who just witness silently to evil deed of few people. 

Psychology relation of a event and its effects

And standing by or closing your eyes is even worse, world is not bad because of bad persons but because of good persons not taking action.Any event good or bad cause effects on everyone, rather victim, preparator and bystanders, bystanders can choose their course of action "FREE WILL" Get out of your shortcomings and think on brighter better side and be part of a better society by acting your small part. Do write what you just thought in comments otherwise thought would be gone in few minutes.

@LIFE #Effects of course of action #Nirbhaya case and #Dimapur http://t.co/6m0HujA7gj pic.twitter.com/MLTaevBxnx

— Karam Veer (@dr_karamveer) March 21, 2015